Dramatic results in Russian pitch competition
Tuesday 05 June
Two months ago Samuel Eto’o complained about the poor quality of the Russian pitches. His opinion has now been confirmed by the results from the Russian pitch competition. On a scale of 1 to 10, 50% of the 14 pitches in the Premier League scored under 4.5.
The Russian Players’ Union PSFT investigated football pitch quality in the Premier League during the final part of the 2011/12 season, i.e. the last 12 matches. Each away team captain scored the pitch right after the game. In total, 14 pitches were rated, used by 16 clubs (two of the pitches were shared by two clubs).
In the end, the strong winners of the Russian pitch competition were Anzhi Makhachkala (play offs Teams 1-8) and Terek Grozny (play-offs 9-16), both in the very south of Russia. Terek (photo) averaged 9.5 points and Anzhi scored 8.9 over six matches.
The results in as many as 50% of the pitches did not scrape above 4.5.
For Vladimir Leonchenko of the Russian Football Union, the outcome of this competition does not come as a surprise. The former Torpedo Moscow player mentions several reasons for the crushing marks given by the Russian captains: ‘The early start of the season had a very negative effect on pitch quality. Zenit and Lokomotiv seriously damaged their pitches during their Europa League matches in mid-February.’
Furthermore, the lack of strict standards is contributing negatively to the quality of the pitches.
Leonchenko: ‘Many players complained about the grass length at Krasnodar. The grass was so high that it slowed down game speed substantially. Most stadiums also have old drainage systems. And there is not one pitch with a mix of natural grass and artificial fibres, used nowadays by half the clubs in the English Premier League. These pitches are far better adapted to poor climate conditions.’
Modern stadiums in southern Russia with a capacity of 15-20,000 could be used for championship and Europa League-matches during the months of February and March. Leonchenko says: ‘But in the last 20 years, stadiums haven’t been built in this part of Russia.’
It is positive that the union’s pitch competition brings to light where the Russian competition falls short. However the conclusions are nothing but negative. Leonchenko states: ‘The league does not have a clearly thought-out plan for football pitch modernization, quality improvement and standard control. Each club solves its problems individually, depending on its management level and their financial situation.’
‘It would help if players’ representatives could participate in pitch licensing. Right now we have no guarantee at all that the situation will be any better next year.’
In 2018, Russia will host the FIFA World Cup.
|Ahmat Arena||Terek Grozny||9.5||Natural|
|Luzhniki||Spartak Moscow and CSKA Moscow||7.0||Artificial|
|Kuban||FC Kuban and FC Krasnodar||6.8||Natural|
|Arena Khimki||Dynamo Moscow||4.4||Natural|
|Metallurg||FC Krylia Sovetov Samara||4.2||Natural|
|Petrovskiy||FC Zenit St Petersburg||4.1||Natural|
|Central||FC Rubin Kazan||4.0||Natural|
|Lokomotiv||FC Volga Novgorod||4.0||Natural|
|Lokomotiv||FC Lokomotiv Moscow||3.7||Natural|
|Trud||FC Tomj Tomsk||3.0||Natural|
- 10-12-2013 Paying players can reduce match-fixing threat »
- 09-12-2013 FIFA FIFPro World XI 2013: Forwards Shortlist »
- 06-12-2013 FIFA heat policy insufficient »
- 06-12-2013 FIFA FIFPro World XI: Midfielders Shortlist »
- 06-12-2013 Long live Nelson Mandela's legacy »
- 06-12-2013 Greek football unites in fight against match-fixing »
- 05-12-2013 Video: President Piat on Belounis’ freedom »
- 05-12-2013 Portuguese union helps CD Fátima players »